Skip to main content
  • Guideline Summary
  • NGC:008691
  • 2011

Care of the patient undergoing intracranial pressure monitoring/external ventricular drainage or lumbar drainage.

American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. Care of the patient undergoing intracranial pressure monitoring/external ventricular drainage or lumbar drainage. Glenview (IL): American Association of Neuroscience Nurses; 2011. 37 p. [164 references]

View the original guideline documentation External Web Site Policy

This is the current release of the guideline.

Age Group

UMLS Concepts (what is this?)

Major Recommendations

The levels of evidence (I-V) supporting the recommendations and levels of recommendations (1-3) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Additional guidance on equipment setup, system maintenance, nursing responsibilities, and patient and family education can be found in the original guideline document.

Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring and External Ventricular Drainage Device (EVD)

Management of EVD Complications

EVD Infections

Prevention of Infection and Strict Adherence to Aseptic Technique

  • Placement of any ICP monitoring device should be performed under conditions that model the operating room with maximum barrier protection. The doors should be closed, all people in the room should wear hats and masks, and the sterile field should be protected. EVD placement is frequently performed urgently, but care should be taken to maintain sterility. Contamination often occurs on the skin tract at placement (Level 2; Dasic et al., 2006). A designee should assist with catheter placement by holding the patient's head (Level 2; Leverstein-van Hall et al., 2010).
  • Manipulation and accessing of the EVD drainage tubing have been shown to be sources for bacterial contamination (Level 2; Hoefnagel et al., 2008; Korinek et al., 2005; Lozier et al., 2002). The risk of CSF infection increases with the duration of the EVD (Level 2; Lozier et al., 2002; Mayhall et al., 1984; Schade et al., 2005). Therefore, access of the EVD for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling should occur when infection is suspected (see Appendix B of the original guideline document for sample policy and procedure).
  • Institutional practices vary on whether EVD tubing manipulation is a nursing or physician practice (Hoefnagel et al., 2008; Korinek et al., 2005; Muttaiyah et al., 2008). This high-risk procedure requires an institutional commitment to training and staff competency (Level 3; Criddle, 2007).
  • No specific studies on cleaning of EVD access ports were found and research is needed on this topic. The best data supporting the cleaning of EVD access ports are from the vascular access device literature, but this is also limited. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends alcohol for cleaning vascular access ports; povidine-iodine is also acceptable (Level 3; Meyer, 2009). Chlorhexidine-alcohol has been shown to be an effective antiseptic for topical skin preparation (Level 1; Darouiche et al., 2010; Hibbard, 2005). For neurosurgical procedures, it has been shown that a 3-minute cleaning with chlorhexidine-alcohol followed by two 30-second cleanings with povidine-iodine is highly effective for sterilizing the skin (Level 1; Guzel et al., 2009). The combined effect of three disinfectants—chlorhexidine, alcohol, and povidine-iodine—would have the broadest bactericidal effect but the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved chlorhexidine for purpose of cleaning access ports (Meyer, 2009).
  • The drainage tubing should not be routinely changed; it should remain for the duration of the EVD (Level 3; expert panel consensus). The initial sterility of the drainage tubing must be meticulously ensured. A two-person method is ideal for priming the tubing with sterile normal saline. The second person should monitor the sterile technique and help if needed. Use a sterile barrier to assemble the drain, wear masks and hats, and wash hands before applying sterile gloves.
  • If the EVD drainage tubing accidentally becomes disconnected, every effort should be made to maintain the sterility of the ventricular catheter. New sterile EVD tubing should be obtained and connected (Level 3; expert panel consensus).
  • Follow strict aseptic technique when the EVD is accessed or irrigated, and use hand hygiene, mask, sterile field, and sterile gloves. Scrub the EVD access port 3 minutes with povidine-iodine or follow individual institutional policy (Level 3; Meyer, 2009; Pope, 1998) (see Appendix B of the original guideline document for sample policy and procedure).
  • Maintaining CSF flow has been suggested as a method to avoid ascending infection (Level 2) (Razmkon & Bakhtazad, 2009).
  • Any contamination of the collection bag can be transferred upward and is avoided by following sterile technique. When changing the collection bag, wear sterile gloves and a mask. Only change the bag when it is nearly full (Level 3; Bader, Littlejohns, & Palmer, 1995; Korinek et al., 2005; Pope, 1998). Change the bag when it is ¾ full (Level 2; Leverstein-van Hall et al., 2010; Thompson, 2000)
  • The collection system should be maintained in the upright position. If for some reason the collection chamber has to be laid down (for example, there is no magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]-compatible holder), the CSF should be drained into the lower collection bag. This will decrease the transfer of any bacteria in the collection chambers to the drainage tubing (Level 3; Woodward et al., 2002).
  • Hand hygiene, gloves, and a new sterile dead-end cap should be used to zero the transducer when necessary after transport. To clear air off the transducer again, wash hands before gloves then drain CSF off into sterile gauze and rezero the transducer (Level 3; expert panel consensus).
  • The EVD tubing access port should be clearly labeled as EVD. It has been repeatedly documented that three-way stopcocks and other EVD ports have been accidentally mistaken for intravenous lines (Level 3; Drake & Crawford, 2005; Howell & Driver, 2008; Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter, 2007). It is recommended that manufacturers design access ports so that these types of human errors are not possible.
  • EVD wound dressings and hair-removal practices vary widely. After implementing an education program to teach nursing staff a strict sterile dressing change procedure, one facility experienced a 78% decrease in infection rate (Level 3; Craighead et al., 2008).
  • An occlusive dressing is placed to cover both incisions. The initial dressing is removed every 48 hours or if soiled per institutional policy. The nurse removes this initial dressing with sterile gloves and also wears a mask. If the hair grows out, the nurse clips it again so that the gauze dressing adheres. The site is inspected for CSF leaks or infection. The nurse then removes the first pair of gloves. Hand hygiene is then performed for a second time before applying a new, second set of sterile gloves. A new sterile gauze dressing is applied to the site, and benzoin is used to hold the tape. The dressing is tight and occlusive. (Level 3; Craighead et al., 2008).
  • For EVD-associated infection rates greater than 10%, it is recommended the institution should investigate its practices and EVD protocols (Level 3; Lozier et al., 2002).
  • CSF leaks represent a site for bacterial en-trance and, when discovered, are important to report (van de Beek, Drake, & Tunkel, 2010).
    • When the EVD is removed, the site should be monitored for a CSF leak. An additional suture may be needed to close the skin incision. There is a high risk for infection with CSF leak after EVD removal, so careful monitoring post removal is warranted (Level 2; Korinek et al., 2005).
    • No IV tubing or cords that could cause tension should be allowed on top of the EVD tubing.
    • If the EVD is accidentally removed, occlusive pressure should be held at the site.

Clinical Signs of Bacterial Ventriculitis and Meningitis in EVD-Associated Infection

  • New or increasing headache, nuchal rigidity, and decreased level of consciousness or cranial nerve signs are reasons to send CSF for infection surveillance (Level 2; Arabi et al., 2005; Frontera et al., 2008; Hoefnagel et al., 2008; Schade et al., 2006; van de Beek, 2004).
  • Persistent and recurrent fever indicates the need to investigate for CSF infection. Positive CSF culture is highly correlated with fever (Level 2; Chang et al., 2008; Weisfelt et al., 2007; Schade et al., 2006).

CSF Analysis

  • CSF processing must be completed quickly to ensure accurate results because CSF is hypotonic. Cell counts decrease by 32% after 1 hour and 50% after 2 hours, and bacteria may not survive long periods in collection tubes (Level 3; Gray & Fedorko, 1992; Johnson & Sexton, 2009). For this reason, CSF is rapidly hand delivered to the laboratory in some institutions. It is imperative that CSF obtained by lumbar puncture is not lost because the patient would require another lumbar puncture to obtain additional CSF.
  • After receiving the report of CSF analysis from the laboratory, notify the physician or advanced practice nurse immediately.

Treatment of Infection

  • The EVD should remain closed, usually for 1 hour, post instillation of antibiotics (Level 3; van de Beek, Drake, & Tunkel, 2010; Ziai & Lewin, 2009).
  • Monitor patients receiving intraventricular antibiotic therapy for signs of neurotoxicity: meningeal irritation, delirium, confusion, focal to general seizures, and hearing loss (Level 3; James & Bradley, 2008; Ziai & Lewin, 2009).
  • Infected EVD catheters should be removed, but there is no consensus on the removal timing (Level 3; James & Bradley, 2008; van de Beek, Drake, & Tunkel, 2010; Ziai & Lewin, 2009). Unstable patient conditions may make catheter removal difficult. In multidrug-resistant acinetobacter meningitis there has been very high mortality when the EVD was not removed (Level 2; Rodriguez Guardado et al., 2008).

Noninfectious Complication of EVD

Aneurysmal Rebleeding and Hemispheric Shifts from Reduction in ICP

  • Monitor ICP drainage and ICP carefully in unsecured ruptured subarachnoid hemorrhage patients and maintain a low threshold to clamp the EVD to prevent CSF overdrainage (Level 3; Fountas et al., 2006).
  • Rapid recognition of aneurysmal rebleeding can be lifesaving. Immediately notify the neurosurgical or neurointensivist team if bright red blood suddenly appears in the EVD tubing and drip chamber. There should be associated vital sign changes: elevated ICP and blood pressure. Discuss measures to control blood pressure elevations with the medical team (Level 3; Rose & Mayer, 2004), which may include:
    • Continuous nicardipine infusion
    • Intravenous labetalol as needed
  • Care should also be taken to avoid CSF overdrainage in patients with unilateral mass lesions to avoid potential hemispheric shifts. (Level 2; Frank, 1995) (Level 3; Adams et al., 2007).

CSF Overdrainage

  • The amount of CSF drainage can affect ICP (Level 2; Kerr et al., 2001). Raising the pressure level of the graduated burette above the zero reference level may create expected pressures within the brain.
    • A 20-cm pressure level above the zero reference level will usually result in an ICP of 20 mmHg. This pressure can have a "tamponade" effect on unsecured ruptured subarachnoid aneurysm (Level 3; Fountas et al., 2006). This can also be a method for gradual weaning from the EVD (Level 2; Klopfenstein et al., 2004).
    • A 10-cm pressure level above the zero reference level will usually result in normal pressures.
    • A zero pressure level is used for maximal pressure unloading and the pressure treated from the CSF would be zero. In this case, there are usually other reasons the patience has higher pressures, such as cerebral edema.
  • Maintain the EVD drip chamber at the prescribed zero reference and pressure levels (Level 3; Freiman & Spiegelberg, 2008; Woodward et al., 2002).
    • Inform the patient and his or her family that changing the bed position is to be performed only with assistance. Raising the level of the bed with an EVD at a fixed zero reference and pressure levels can result in a large increase in CSF drainage.
    • Ensure that the zero reference and pressure levels are maintained.
    • Educate all members of the medical team about the risks of changes in the height of the bed (Level 3; Muraskin, Roy, & Patrozza, 2007).
  • Clamp the EVD any time there is a patient response or procedure that may cause CSF overdrainage (Level 3; Woodward et al., 2002). Unclamp and allow CSF drainage when the stimulation has stopped and the patient is settled.
    • Clamp EVD for coughing, vomiting, suctioning, or repositioning.
    • Observe patient responses to provide care, and plan according to these responses.
    • Sedation may be given prior to nursing procedures.
    • Clamp the EVD prior to the disturbances that occur during patient transport. Un-clamp when the nursing procedures are completed.

Hemorrhage and Misplacement Complications of EVD Placement

  • The patient may need sedation, but this will vary greatly depending upon the medical condition of the patient: prior intubation, obtundation, or alert and awake. The nurse must monitor and document the patient's respiratory status and vital signs during the entire procedure and cannot leave the bedside. Other nurses will be required to assist if materials or medications are needed that are not present at the bedside.
  • Assess CSF flow and ICP waveform (Level 2; Kakarla et al., 2008).
  • Prepare to assist with placement of an alternative ICP monitor if multiple freehand passes are needed (Level 3; Huyette et al., 2008).
  • Postprocedure head CT scans are not routinely completed in all institutions, but patients often require a head CT for other reasons within 24–48 hours. Ensure that the head CT is completed in a timely fashion.

Lumbar Drainage Devices (LDDs)

Equipment Setup

Procedure for Priming the LDD Tubing

Set the zero reference level with each patient position change, particularly when the head of the bed has been raised or lowered, during patient transport, or if the patient has been out of bed or is returned to bed (Level 3; expert panel consensus).

Nursing Responsibilities Postplacement

Patient Assessment

  1. The patient should be assessed every hour in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and every 1–2 hours in the intermediate care or floor setting (Level 3; expert panel consensus). Changes from the baseline neurological assessment include, but are not limited to, decreased level of consciousness, focal deficit, pupillary changes, vision, headache, and signs of meningeal irritation (e.g., photophobia, nuchal rigidity, headache, irritability). More frequent assessment may be indicated by patient condition or type of drainage regulation used. The physician, advanced practice nurse, or other qualified healthcare provider should be notified immediately of all neurological changes.
  2. The patient should be assessed every 1–2 hours (Q 1 hour for intensive care unit setting; Q 2 hours for floor setting) for signs and symptoms of infection, including presence of elevated temperature and signs of infection or leaking at the insertion site (Level 2; Clevenger, 1990; Governale et al., 2008; Hoekema, Schmidt, & Ross, 2007). 
  3. The amount, clarity, and color of CSF drainage should be assessed and recorded every 1–2 hours (1 hour for ICU setting; 2 hours for floor setting) as ordered by the physician, advanced practice nurse, or other qualified healthcare provider. More frequent checks may be required while ensuring the level of the drain is yielding appropriate amounts of CSF drainage for volume-regulated drainage. During this time, the level of the drain and security of the drainage system to maintain the appropriate position should also be assessed (Level 3; expert panel consensus).

Management of LDD Complications

Bacterial Colonization and Infection

Remove the drain and provide antibiotic treatment (Level 3; Governale et al., 2008).

Meningeal Irritation

Monitor for nuchal rigidity, photophobia, and turbid or purulent CSF. The physician should be notified immediately of these symptoms (Level 3; Littlejohns, 2009).

Nerve Root Irritation

Prompt catheter removal by the healthcare provider is recommended for limb weakness (Level 3; Ganjoo et al., 2009).

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

Class I: Randomized controlled trial without significant limitations or meta-analysis

Class II: Randomized controlled trial with important limitations (e.g., methodological flaws, inconsistent results), observational study (e.g., cohort, case control)

Class III: Qualitative study, case study, or series

Class IV: Evidence from reports of expert committees and/or expert opinion of the guideline panel, standards of care, and clinical protocols that have been identified

Levels of Recommendations

Level 1: Recommendations are supported by class I evidence.

Level 2: Recommendations are supported by class II evidence.

Level 3: Recommendations are supported by class III and class IV evidence.

Clinical Algorithm(s)

None provided

Disease/Condition(s)

Conditions requiring intracranial pressure monitoring/extraventricular ventricular or lumbar drainage

Guideline Category

Counseling

Evaluation

Management

Prevention

Treatment

Clinical Specialty

Critical Care

Infectious Diseases

Neurological Surgery

Neurology

Nursing

Surgery

Intended Users

Advanced Practice Nurses

Hospitals

Nurses

Guideline Objective(s)

To assist registered nurses (RNs), patient care units, and institutions in providing safe and effective care to patients undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring via an external ventricular drainage device (EVD) or subarachnoid drainage of cerebrospinal fluid with a lumbar drainage device (LDD)

Target Population

Patients undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring via an external ventricular drainage device (EVD) or subarachnoid drainage of cerebrospinal fluid with a lumbar drainage device (LDD)

Interventions and Practices Considered

Management/Treatment

  1. Equipment setup, including priming, zeroing, and calibrating devices
  2. Obtaining an intracranial pressure tracing
  3. Draining cerebrospinal fluid
  4. Catheter insertion, including patient preparation
  5. System maintenance and assessment
  6. Management of complications, including infection
  7. Device removal

Counseling/Prevention

  1. Reporting CSF leaks
  2. Notification of CSF analysis results
  3. Patient/family education

Major Outcomes Considered

  • Incidence of infection
  • Incidence of noninfectious complications
  • Mortality

Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence

Hand-searches of Published Literature (Primary Sources)

Hand-searches of Published Literature (Secondary Sources)

Searches of Electronic Databases

Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence

In development of this guideline, nurse experts reviewed the published literature from 2000 to December 2010 using PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the search included the following terms: intracranial pressure monitoring device, intracranial pressure waveform, external ventricular drain, lumbar drain, indwelling catheters, drainage, cerebrospinal fluid, ventriculostomy, and nursing. Monographs and textbooks were also consulted. Studies not written in English were excluded from further evaluation.

Number of Source Documents

Not stated

Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence

Expert Consensus

Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence

Levels of Evidence

Class I: Randomized controlled trial without significant limitations or meta-analysis

Class II: Randomized controlled trial with important limitations (e.g., methodological flaws or inconsistent results), observational studies (e.g., cohort or case control)

Class III: Qualitative studies, case study, or series

Class IV: Evidence from reports of expert committees and expert opinion of the guideline panel, standards of care, and clinical protocols

Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Systematic Review

Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Data quality was evaluated based on the evaluation of available evidence and expert panel consensus.

Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations

Expert Consensus

Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations

Recommendations for practice were established based on the evaluation of available evidence and expert panel consensus.

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations

Levels of Recommendation

Level 1: Recommendations are supported by class I evidence.

Level 2: Recommendations are supported by class II evidence.

Level 3: Recommendations are supported by class III and IV evidence.

Cost Analysis

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

Method of Guideline Validation

Peer Review

Description of Method of Guideline Validation

The guideline underwent peer review by a panel of reviewers listed in the guideline document.

References Supporting the Recommendations

Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb RL, Higashida RT, Jauch EC, Kidwell C, Lyden PD, Morgenstern LB, Qureshi AI, Rosenwasser RH, Scott PA, Wijdicks EFM, American Heart Association, American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology [trunc]. Stroke. 2007 May;38(5):1655-711. [738 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Arabi Y, Memish ZA, Balkhy HH, Francis C, Ferayan A, Al Shimemeri A, Almuneef MA. Ventriculostomy-associated infections: incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control. 2005 Apr;33(3):137-43. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Bader MK, Littlejohns L, Palmer S. Ventriculostomy and intracranial pressure monitoring: in search of a 0% infection rate. Heart Lung. 1995 Mar-Apr;24(2):166-72. [30 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Chang WN, Lu CH, Huang CR, Tsai NW, Chuang YC, Chang CC, Chen SF, Chien CC. Changing epidemiology of adult bacterial meningitis in southern Taiwan: a hospital-based study. Infection. 2008 Feb;36(1):15-22. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Clevenger V. Nursing management of lumbar drains. J Neurosci Nurs. 1990 Aug;22(4):227-31. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Craighead MC, Matt MP, Davis SB, McMullen KM, Lessly D, Warren DK. Interventions resulting in a sustained decrease in ventriculitis rates in a neurology/neurosurgical intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:E199-200.

Criddle L. Ask the experts. Crit Care Nurse. 2007;27:78-81.

Darouiche RO, Wall MJ Jr, Itani KM, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM, Miller HJ, Awad SS, Crosby CT, Mosier MC, Alsharif A, Berger DH. Chlorhexidine-Alcohol versus Povidone-Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 7;362(1):18-26. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Dasic D, Hanna SJ, Bojanic S, Kerr RS. External ventricular drain infection: the effect of a strict protocol on infection rates and a review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg. 2006 Oct;20(5):296-300. [22 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Drake JM, Crawford MW. Near-miss injection of an anesthetic agent into a cerebrospinal fluid external ventricular drain: special report. Neurosurgery. 2005 May;56(5):E1161; discussion E1161. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Machinis T, Karampelas I, Smisson HF, Robinson JS. Review of the literature regarding the relationship of rebleeding and external ventricular drainage in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage of aneurysmal origin. Neurosurg Rev. 2006 Jan;29(1):14-8; discussion 19-20. [43 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Frank JI. Large hemispheric infarction, deterioration, and intracranial pressure. Neurology. 1995 Jul;45(7):1286-90. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Freiman TM, Spiegelberg A. Mounting device for external cerebrospinal fluid drainage: the Freiburg Stativ. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Oct;150(10):1081-5. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Frontera JA, Fernandez A, Schmidt JM, Claassen J, Wartenberg KE, Badjatia N, Parra A, Connolly ES, Mayer SA. Impact of nosocomial infectious complications after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2008 Jan;62(1):80-7; discussion 87. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Ganjoo P, Sejwal S, Sinha S, Tandon MS, Daljit DS. Intermittent lumbar drainage as a viable treatment option for cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea complicating pituitary surgery. Internet J Anesthesiol. 2009;20(2)

Governale LS, Fein N, Logsdon J, Black PM. Techniques and complications of external lumbar drainage for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2008 Oct;63(4 Suppl 2):379-84; discussion 384. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Gray LD, Fedorko DP. Laboratory diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992 Apr;5(2):130-45. [163 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Guzel A, Ozekinci T, Ozkan U, Celik Y, Ceviz A, Belen D. Evaluation of the skin flora after chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine preparation in neurosurgical practice. Surg Neurol. 2009 Feb;71(2):207-10; discussion 210. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Hibbard JS. Analyses comparing the antimicrobial activity and safety of current antiseptic agents: a review. J Infus Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;28(3):194-207. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Hoefnagel D, Dammers R, Ter Laak-Poort MP, Avezaat CJ. Risk factors for infections related to external ventricular drainage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Mar;150(3):209-14; discussion 214. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Hoekema D, Schmidt RH, Ross I. Lumbar drainage for subarachnoid hemorrhage: technical considerations and safety analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2007;7(1):3-9. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Howell S, Driver RP Jr. Unintentional intracerebroventricular administration of etomidate and rocuronium. Anesth Analg. 2008 Feb;106(2):520-2. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Huyette DR, Turnbow BJ, Kaufman C, Vaslow DF, Whiting BB, Oh MY. Accuracy of the freehand pass technique for ventriculostomy catheter placement: retrospective assessment using computed tomography scans. J Neurosurg. 2008 Jan;108(1):88-91. PubMed External Web Site Policy

James HE, Bradley JS. Management of complicated shunt infections: a clinical report. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008 Mar;1(3):223-8. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Johnson KS, Sexton DJ. Cerebrospinal fluid: Physiology and utility of an examination in disease states. [internet]. 2009 Sep 30 [accessed 2010 Feb 08].

Kakarla UK, Kim LJ, Chang SW, Theodore N, Spetzler RF. Safety and accuracy of bedside external ventricular drain placement. Neurosurgery. 2008 Jul;63(1 Suppl 1):ONS162-6; discussion ONS1. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Kerr ME, Weber BB, Sereika SM, Wilberger J, Marion DW. Dose response to cerebrospinal fluid drainage on cerebral perfusion in traumatic brain-injured adults. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;11(4):E1. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Klopfenstein JD, Kim LJ, Feiz-Erfan I, Hott JS, Goslar P, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Comparison of rapid and gradual weaning from external ventricular drainage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective randomized trial. J Neurosurg. 2004 Feb;100(2):225-9. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Korinek AM, Reina M, Boch AL, Rivera AO, De Bels D, Puybasset L. Prevention of external ventricular drain--related ventriculitis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Jan;147(1):39-45; discussion 45-6. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter. Ventriculostomy catheter: nurse-infused mixture meant for IV. 15, 6. [internet]. Seattle (WA): Legal Eagle Eye; 2007 Apr [accessed 2011 Apr 25].

Leverstein-van Hall MA, Hopmans TE, van der Sprenkel JW, Blok HE, van der Mark WA, Hanlo PW, Bonten MJ. A bundle approach to reduce the incidence of external ventricular and lumbar drain-related infections. J Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;112(2):345-53. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Littlejohns L. Monitoring technologies in critically ill neuroscience patients. In: American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. AACN-AANN Protocols for Practice. Sudbury (MA): Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2009. p. 83-92.

Lozier AP, Sciacca RR, Romagnoli MF, Connolly ES Jr. Ventriculostomy-related infections: a critical review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2002 Jul;51(1):170-81; discussion 181-2. [38 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA, Spadora AC, Baggett JW, Ward JD, Narayan RK. Ventriculostomy-related infections. A prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med. 1984 Mar 1;310(9):553-9. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Meyer J. A broad-spectrum look at catheter-related bloodstream infections: many aspects, many populations. J Infus Nurs. 2009 Mar-Apr;32(2):80-6. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Muraskin SI, Roy RC, Petrozza PH. Overdrainage of cerebrospinal fluid during central venous catheter exchange in a patient with an external ventricular drain. Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1519-20. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Muttaiyah S, Ritchie S, Upton A, Roberts S. Clinical parameters do not predict infection in patients with external ventricular drains: a retrospective observational study of daily cerebrospinal fluid analysis. J Med Microbiol. 2008 Feb;57(Pt 2):207-9. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Pope W. External ventriculostomy: a practical application for the acute care nurse. J Neurosci Nurs. 1998 Jun;30(3):185-90. [11 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Razmkon A, Bakhtazad A. Maintaining CSF drainage at external ventricular drains may help prevent catheter-related infections. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Aug;151(8):985. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Rodriguez Guardado A, Blanco A, Asensi V, Perez F, Rial JC, Pintado V, Bustillo E, Lantero M, Tenza E, Alvarez M, Maradona JA, Carton JA. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter meningitis in neurosurgical patients with intraventricular catheters: assessment of different treatments. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Apr;61(4):908-13. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Rose JC, Mayer SA. Optimizing blood pressure in neurological emergencies. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1(3):287-99. [93 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Schade RP, Schinkel J, Roelandse FW, Geskus RB, Visser LG, van Dijk JM, Voormolen JH, Van Pelt H, Kuijper EJ. Lack of value of routine analysis of cerebrospinal fluid for prediction and diagnosis of external drainage-related bacterial meningitis. J Neurosurg. 2006 Jan;104(1):101-8. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Thompson HJ. Managing patients with lumbar drainage devices. Crit Care Nurse. 2000 Oct;20(5):59-68. [19 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

van de Beek D, de Gans J, Spanjaard L, Weisfelt M, Reitsma JB, Vermeulen M. Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis [Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):950]. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 28;351(18):1849-59. PubMed External Web Site Policy

van de Beek D, Drake JM, Tunkel AR. Nosocomial bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 14;362(2):146-54. [41 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Weisfelt M, van de Beek D, Spanjaard L, de Gans J. Nosocomial bacterial meningitis in adults: a prospective series of 50 cases. J Hosp Infect. 2007 May;66(1):71-8. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Woodward S, Addison C, Shah S, Brennan F, MacLeod A, Clements M. Benchmarking best practice for external ventricular drainage. Br J Nurs. 2002 Jan 10-23;11(1):47-53. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Ziai WC, Lewin JJ 3rd. Improving the role of intraventricular antimicrobial agents in the management of meningitis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009 Jun;22(3):277-82. [47 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for selected recommendations (see the "Major Recommendations" field).

Potential Benefits

Safe and effective care of patients undergoing intracranial pressure monitoring (ICP) monitoring via an external ventricular drainage device (EVD) or subarachnoid drainage of cerebrospinal fluid with a lumbar drainage device (LDD)

Potential Harms

Not stated

Contraindications

It is contraindicated to place ventricular catheter in nondominant hemisphere.

The relative contraindications to a lumbar drainage device (LDD) are:

  • Coagulopathy, active bleeding, or severe thrombocytopenia
  • Brain abscess
  • History of prior lumbar spine surgery
  • History of prior lumbar vertebral fracture

The absolute contraindications to a LDD are:

  • Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) (excludes documented pseudo-tumor cerebri patients)
  • Unequal pressures between the supratentorial and infratentorial compartments as evidence by the following head CT findings:
    • Midline shift
    • Loss of suprachiasmatic and basilar cisterns
    • Posterior fossa mass
    • Loss of the superior cerebellar cistern
    • Loss of the quadrigeminal plate cistern
  • Infected skin over the needle entry site
  • Spinal epidural abscess
  • Intracranial mass
  • Obstructive noncommunicating hydrocephalus
  • Spinal arteriovenous malformation

Qualifying Statements

  • The authors, editors, and publisher of this document neither represent nor guarantee that the practices described herein will, if followed, ensure safe and effective patient care. The authors, editors, and publisher further assume no liability or responsibility in connection with any information or recommendations contained in this document. These recommendations reflect the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses' judgment regarding the state of general knowledge and practice in this field as of the date of publication and are subject to change based on the availability of new scientific information.
  • This guideline is not intended to replace formal learning, but rather to augment the knowledge base of clinicians and provide a readily available reference tool.

Description of Implementation Strategy

An implementation strategy was not provided.

Implementation Tools

Resources

For information about availability, see the Availability of Companion Documents and Patient Resources fields below.

IOM Care Need

Getting Better

Living with Illness

IOM Domain

Effectiveness

Patient-centeredness

Safety

Bibliographic Source(s)

American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. Care of the patient undergoing intracranial pressure monitoring/external ventricular drainage or lumbar drainage. Glenview (IL): American Association of Neuroscience Nurses; 2011. 37 p. [164 references]

Adaptation

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

Date Released

2011

Guideline Developer(s)

American Association of Neuroscience Nurses - Professional Association

Source(s) of Funding

American Association of Neuroscience Nurses

This publication was made possible by an educational grant from Codman and Shurtleff, a Johnson & Johnson Company.

Guideline Committee

Not stated

Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline

Content Authors: Tess Slazinski, MN RN CNRN CCRN (Chair); Tracey A. Anderson, MSN RN CNRN FNP-BC ACNP; Elizabeth Cattell, MN CNRN ACNP-BC; Janice E. Eigsti, MSN RN CNRN CCRN; Susan Heimsoth, BSN RN; Judie Holleman, MSN RN; Amanda Johnson, MSN RN CPNP; Mary L. King, MSN/Ed RN CNRN; Twyila Lay, MS RN ACNP ANP; Mary Presciutti, BSN RN CNRN CCRN; Robert S. Prior, RN CNRN; Brian A. Richlik, BSN RN CNRN CCRN; Shawn Smelzer, BSN RN CCRN; Anna Ver Hage, BSN RN CNRN CCRN; Carol L. Wamboldt, CNRN; Kelly White, BSN RN CNRN CCRN; Paula Zakrzewski, MSN RN CPNP-AC

Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

A staff member, volunteer or family member who has an affiliation with a commercial company must declare that relationship in advance of involvement with an education activity that could be used as a forum to promote interest of that company and its products. None of the authors or planners has anything to disclose related to this activity.

Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

Guideline Availability

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses Web site External Web Site Policy.

Availability of Companion Documents

The following is available:

Patient Resources

None available

NGC Status

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on January 23, 2012. The information was verified by the guideline developer on February 2, 2012. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on March 6, 2014 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Over-the-Counter Topical Antiseptic Products.

Copyright Statement

This summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

NGC Disclaimer

The National Guideline Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion-criteria.aspx.

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.