Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2008. 50 p. (SIGN publication; no. 103). [250 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory and/or warning information has been released.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): In addition to these evidence-based recommendations, the guideline development group also identifies points of best clinical practice in the full-text guideline document.

The grades of recommendations (A–D) and levels of evidence (1++, 1+, 1-, 2++, 2+, 2-, 3, 4) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Risk Factors, Diagnosis and Classification

Detection of Individuals at Higher Risk of Developing Chronic Kidney Disease

Diabetes Mellitus

D - All patients with diabetes should have regular surveillance of renal function.

Smoking

C - Smoking should be considered as a risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease.

Obesity and Socioeconomic Status

C - Low socioeconomic status should be considered as a risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease.

Detecting Kidney Damage

Proteinuria

B - In patients with diabetes, albumin/creatinine ratio may be used to exclude diabetic nephropathy.

C - Albumin/creatinine ratio is recommended for detecting and monitoring diabetic nephropathy.

B - In patient groups with a high prevalence of proteinuria without diabetes, protein/creatinine ratio may be used to exclude chronic kidney disease.

D - In patients with established chronic kidney disease and without diabetes, measurement of protein/creatinine ratio may be used to predict risk of progressive disease.

Haematuria

D - Patients with persisting isolated microscopic haematuria should be initially evaluated for urinary tract infection and malignancy.

Comparing Renal Function Tests

C - Where an assessment of glomerular filtration rate is required prediction equations should be used in preference to 24-hour urine creatinine clearance or serum creatinine alone.

Treatment

Lowering Blood Pressure

A - Blood pressure should be controlled to slow the deterioration of glomerular filtration rate and reduce proteinuria. Patients with ≥1 g/day of proteinuria (approximately equivalent to a protein/creatinine ratio of 100 mg/mmol) should have a target maximum systolic blood pressure of 130 mmHg.

Reducing Proteinuria

A - Patients with chronic kidney disease and proteinuria should be treated to reduce proteinuria.

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs)

Reducing the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

Progression of Microalbuminuria to Macroalbuminuria in Diabetes Mellitus

A - Patients with chronic kidney disease and type 1 diabetes with microalbuminuria should be treated with an ACE inhibitor irrespective of blood pressure.

A - Patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria should be treated with an ACE inhibitor or an ARB irrespective of blood pressure.

Proteinuria Reduction in Non-diabetic Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

A - ACE inhibitors and ARBs are the agents of choice to reduce proteinuria in patients without diabetes but who have chronic kidney disease and proteinuria.

Combination Treatment with ACE Inhibitors and ARBs

A - ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs should be used as agents of choice in patients (with or without diabetes) with chronic kidney disease and proteinuria (≥0.5 g/day, approximately equivalent to a protein/creatinine ratio of 50 mg/mmol) in order to reduce the rate of progression of chronic kidney disease.

Non-Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers

Reducing the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

A - Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers should be considered in patients with chronic kidney disease and proteinuria who are intolerant of ACE inhibitors or ARBs.

Lipid Lowering

Reducing the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

B - Statin therapy should be considered in all patients with stage 1-3 chronic kidney disease, with a predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk ≥ 20%.

Antiplatelet Therapy

Reducing the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

B - Low-dose antiplatelet therapy should be considered in all patients with stage 1-3 chronic kidney disease, whose estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk is ≥ 20%.

Dietary Modification

Reducing the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

Protein Restrictions

A - Dietary protein restrictions (<0.8 g/kg/day) are not recommended in patients with early stages of chronic kidney disease (stages 1-3).

Reducing the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

B - For patients with stage 1-4 chronic kidney disease and hypertension a reduction in sodium (<2.4 g/day or <100 mmol/day which is equivalent to <6 g of salt) is recommended as part of a comprehensive strategy to lower blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular risk.

Treatments to Improve Quality of Life

Psychosocial Management

Patient Education

B - The delivery of a psychologically informed, pre-dialysis psychoeducation programme is recommended for all patients with progressive chronic kidney disease at any stage who will eventually require renal replacement therapy.

Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents in the Management of Anaemia

A - Erythropoiesis stimulating agents should be considered in all patients with anaemia of chronic kidney disease to improve their quality of life.

Preventing Malnutrition

D - Nutritional status (height, weight, body mass index, percentage weight loss) should be monitored in all patients with chronic kidney disease at stage 3 or higher.

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

1++: High quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or RCTs with a very low risk of bias

1+: Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a low risk of bias

1-: Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a high risk of bias

2++: High quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies
High quality case control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal

2+: Well-conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal

2-: Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal

3: Non-analytic studies (e.g., case reports, case series)

4: Expert opinion

Grades of Recommendation

Note: The grade of recommendation relates to the strength of the evidence on which the recommendation is based. It does not reflect the clinical importance of the recommendation.

A: At least one meta-analysis, systematic review of RCTs, or RCT rated as 1++ and directly applicable to the target population; or

A body of evidence consisting principally of studies rated as 1+, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results

B: A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+

C: A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++

D: Evidence level 3 or 4; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2+

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

An algorithm for screening, assessment and diagnosis of patients with chronic kidney disease is provided in the original guideline document.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2008. 50 p. (SIGN publication; no. 103). [250 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2008

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network - National Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Scottish Executive Health Department

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Guideline Development Group: Professor Alison MacLeod, Consultant Nephrologist, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (Chair); Dr Tariq Ali, Research Associate, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary; Dr Gordon Allan, General Practitioner, Methil; Mrs Jane Bryce, Scottish Patients Advisory Group, Kidney Research UK; Mrs Hazel Elliott, Dietitian, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary; Dr Nicholas Fluck, Consultant Nephrologist, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary; Dr Jane Goddard, Consultant Nephrologist, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary; Dr John Hunter, Consultant Physician and Rheumatologist, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow; Mrs Joanna Kelly, Information Officer, SIGN; Dr Mark MacGregor, Consultant Nephrologist, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock; Ms Shonaid McCabe, Clinical Specialist in Occupational Therapy, Monklands Hospital, Airdrie; Dr Michael J Murphy, Senior Lecturer in Biochemical Medicine, University of Dundee; Dr Moray Nairn, Programme Manager, SIGN; Ms Maureen Perry, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Renal Unit, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee; Dr Maria K Rossi, Consultant in Public Health, NHS Grampian; Dr Diana Johnston, General Practitioner, Dundee; Ms Shelagh Salter, Physiotherapist, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary; Ms Sara Smith, Undergraduate Programme Leader – Dietetics, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh; Dr Casey Stewart, Clinical Director - Acute Medicine, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary; Dr Mark Strachan, Consultant Physician, Western General Hospital; Ms Morag Whittle, Renal Pharmacist, Glasgow Royal Infirmary; Dr Matt Wild, Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Glasgow Royal Infirmary

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All members of the guideline development group made declarations of interest and further details of these are available on request from the SIGN Executive.

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

A sample information leaflet for patient is provided in the original guideline document.

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI Institute on September 4, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo